You are here: Home Contents V22 N1 V22N1_Goel.html
Personal tools

A Multi-Method Exploratory Analysis of Risk Disclosures Following a Security Breach

 

 

Full text
View
Purchase

Source
Journal of Information Systems Security
Volume 22, Number 1 (2026)
Pages 941
ISSN 1551-0123 (Print)
ISSN 1551-0808 (Online)
Authors
Sunita Goel — Siena University, USA
Nishani Vincent — University of Tennessee, USA
Publisher
Information Institute Publishing, Washington DC, USA

 

 

Abstract

Regulators and investors increasingly question the usefulness of risk disclosures, arguing that such disclosures are redundant, use generic boilerplate language, and lack company-specific information necessary for meaningful risk assessment – issues that become even more critical following a breach, when stakeholders require clear and credible information to evaluate whether a firm is exposed to certain risks more than others. This study examines the risk disclosures of Fortune 500 companies that have experienced a breach, applying a multi-method approach that combines thematic, readability, and tone analyses to understand how firms communicate negative events. Through thematic analysis, we identify dominant themes and concepts and explore their connection to breach incidents. Readability analysis assesses the difficulty level of disclosures and tone analysis evaluates whether firms attempt to neutralize the negative impact of such events. Our findings provide useful insights for corporate boards, risk managers, auditors, and regulators seeking to strengthen the integrity and decision-usefulness of risk disclosures. 

 

 

Keywords

Risk Disclosures, Breach, Thematic Analysis, Readability Analysis, Tone Analysis.

 

 

References

Abraham, S. and Shrives, P.J. 2014. Improving the relevance of risk factor disclosure in corporate annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 46(1): 91–107.

Allee, K. D. and Deangelis, M. D. 2015. The structure of voluntary disclosure narratives: Evidence from tone dispersion. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2): 241–274.

Amini, M., Bienstock, C. C., Narcum, J. A. 2018. Status of corporate sustainability: A content analysis of Fortune 500 companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8): 1450–1461.

Amir, E., Levi, S., Livne, T. 2018. Do firms underreport information on cyberattacks? Evidence from capital markets. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(3): 1177–1206.

Anderson, J. 1983. Lix and Rix: Variations on a little-known readability index. Journal of Reading, 26(6): 490–496.

Beatty, A., Cheng, L., Zhang, H. W. 2019. Are risk factor disclosures still relevant? Evidence from market reactions to risk factor disclosures before and after the financial crisis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(2): 805–838.

Blanco, B., Coram, P., Dhole, S., Kent, P. 2021. How do auditors respond to low annual report readability? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(3): 106769.

Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2013. Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.

Bushee, B., Gow, I., Taylor, D. 2018. Linguistic complexity in firm disclosures: Obfuscation or information? Journal of Accounting Research, 56(1): 85–121.

Cameron, D., Finlayson, A., Wotzko, R. 2011. Visualizing social computing output: Mapping student blogs and tweets. In B. White, I. King, and P. Tsang (eds.), Social media tools and platforms in learning environments, Heidelberg: Springer, 337–352.

Carey, S. 2016. Delta meltdown reflects problems with aging technology. The Wall Street Journal, 8 August 2016.

Caserio, C., Panaro, D., Trucco, S. 2019. Management discussion and analysis: A tone analysis on US financial listed companies. Management Decision, 58(3): 510–525.

Cazier, R. A., McMullin, J. L., Treu, J. S. 2021. Are lengthy and boilerplate risk factor disclosures inadequate? An examination of judicial and regulatory assessments of risk factor language. Accounting Review, 96(4): 131–155.

Chen, J., Henry, E., Jiang, X. 2023. Is cybersecurity risk factor disclosure informative? Evidence from disclosures following a data breach. Journal of Business Ethics, 187(1): 199–224.

Cheong, A., Yoon, K., Cho, S., No, W. G. 2021. Classifying the contents of cybersecurity risk disclosure through textual analysis and factor analysis. Journal of Information Systems, 35(2): 179–194.

Cho, C., Roberts, R., Patten, D. M. 2010. The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35: 431–443.

Clatworthy, M. and Jones, M. J. 2001. The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(3): 311–326.

Core, J. E. 2001. A review of the empirical disclosure literature: Discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3): 441–456.

Crofts, K. and Bisman, J. 2010. Interrogating accountability: An illustration of the use of Leximancer software for qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(2): 180–207.

Courtis, J. K. 1987. Fry, smog, lix and rix: Insinuations about corporate business communications. The Journal of Business Communication, 24(2): 19–27

Courtis, J. K. 2004. Corporate report obfuscation: Artefact or phenomenon? British Accounting Review, 36(3): 291–312.

Daly, J., Kellehear, A., Gliksman, M. 1997. The public health researcher: A methodological approach. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.

Davis, A., Piger, J., Sedor, L. 2012. Beyond the numbers: Measuring the information content of earnings press release language. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29: 845–868.

Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., Yang, Y. G. 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1): 59–100.

Francis, J. R., Khurana, I. K., Pereira, R. 2005. Disclosure incentives and effects on cost of capital around the world. The Accounting Review, 80(4): 1125–1162.

Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5: 80–92.

Flesch, R. 1948. A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3): 221–233.

Fortin, A. and Héroux, S. 2023. Limited usefulness of firm-provided cybersecurity information in institutional investors’ investment analysis. Information & Computer Security, 31(1): 108–123.

Fry, E. 1968. A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11(7): 513–578.

Fry, E. 1987. The varied uses of readability measurements today. Journal of Reading, 30(4): 338–343.

Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., Zhou, L. 2011. The impact of information security breaches: Has there been a downward shift in costs? Journal of Computer Security, 19(1): 33–56.

Gosselin, A.-M., Le Maux, J., Smaili, N. 2021. Readability of accounting disclosures: A comprehensive review and research agenda. Accounting Perspectives, 20(4): 543–581.

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., Namey, E. E. 2012. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hart, R. P. 2000. DICTION 5.0: The text analysis program. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Healy, P. M. and Palepu, K. G. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31: 405–440.

Henry, E. 2008. Are investors influenced by how earnings press releases are written? Journal of Business Communication, 45(4): 363–407.

Hope, O. K., Hu, D., Lu, H. 2016. The benefits of specific risk-factor disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(4): 1005–1045.

Huang, F., Wang, T., Yen, J. 2023. Using relevant headings in risk factor disclosures: What is the impact on information processing? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 42(5): 107123.

Huang, X., Teoh, S. H., Zhang, Y. 2014. Tone management. The Accounting Review, 89(3): 1083–1113.

Hutton, A. P., Miller, G. S., Skinner, D. J. 2003. The role of supplementary statements with management earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(5): 867–890.

Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.

Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., Martin, G. S. 2008. The consequences to managers for financial misrepresentation. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2): 193–215.

Kothari, S. P., Shu, S., Wysocki, P. D. 2009. Do managers withhold bad news? Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1): 241–276.Kravet, T. and Muslu, V. 2013. Textual risk disclosures and investors’ risk perceptions. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(4): 1088–1122.

Li, F. 2008. Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45: 221–247.

Li, O. Z. and Zhuang, Z. 2012. Management guidance and the underpricing of seasoned equity offerings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3): 710–737.

Lo, K., Ramos, F., Rogo, R. 2017. Earnings management and annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63: 1–25.

Loughran, T. and McDonald, B. 2011. When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis dictionaries and 10-Ks. The Journal of Finance, 66(1): 35–66.

Means, T. L. 1981. Readability: An evaluative criterion of stockholder reaction to annual reports. The Journal of Business Communication, 18(1): 25–33.

Merkl-Davies, D. M. and Brennan, N. M. 2007. Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management? Journal of Accounting Literature, 26: 116–196.

Miller, B. 2010. The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading. The Accounting Review, 85(6): 2107–2143.

Nigel, J. M. and Rice, J. 2007. Profiling enterprise risks in large computer companies using the Leximancer software tool. Risk Management, 9(3): 188–206.

Nunez-Mir, G., Iannone, B. V. III, Pijanowski, B., Kong, N., Fei, S. 2016. Automated content analysis: Addressing the big literature challenge in ecology and evolution. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7: 1262–1272.

Oleander Software. 2015. Readability Studio. Retrieved from https://www.oleandersolutions.com/readabilitystudio.html

Rajabalizadeh, J. 2024. Corporate culture’s influence on the transparency of financial reporting in Iran: An in-depth analysis of readability and tone. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 26(6): 47–85.

Shroff, N., Sun, A., White, H., Zhang, W. 2013. Voluntary disclosure and information asymmetry: Evidence from the 2005 securities offering reform. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(5): 1299–1345.

Skinner, D. J. 1994. Why firms voluntarily disclose bad news. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1): 38–60.

Skinner, D. J. 1997. Earnings disclosures and stockholder lawsuits. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23(3): 249–282.

Smaili, N., Gosselin, A. M., Le Maux, J. 2023. Corporate financial disclosures and the importance of readability. The Journal of Business Strategy, 44(2): 105–113.

Smith, A. and Humphreys, M. 2006. Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods, 38: 262–279.

Subramanian, R., Insley, R. G., Blackwell, R. D. 1993. Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitability and unprofitability corporations. Journal of Business Communication, 30(1): 49–61.

Verrecchia, R. E. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5(1): 179–194.

Verrecchia, R. E. 2001. Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3): 97–180.

Wang, L. W., Miller, M. J., Schmitt, M. R., Wen, F. K. 2013. Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: Application, results, and recommendations. Research in Social and Administrative  Pharmacy, 9(5): 503– 516.

Wilk, V., Soutar, G. N., Harrigan, P. 2019. Tackling social media data analysis: Comparing and contrasting QSR NVivo and Leximancer. Qualitative Market Research, 22(2): 94–113.